Laboratory Informstion System for Academic Medical Center Coursework

Laboratory Informstion System for Academic Medical Center - Coursework Examplepag). Also, it is much convenient to go for considering the speed and the volume of data available in the system (Robinson n. pag). Lastly, it facilitates more efficient project management a single service provider gives more detailed, responsive, and coordinated action in times of system errors or even, in the regular maintenance of the system. B. An example of a fully integrated solution is the HNA Millenium , a system built to automate electronic medical record, patient care ordering, review of resident orders, closed-loop medication management, health information management, and access management (Krishna 18). For its research laboratory system component, it seeks to reduce the average turn-around time for laboratory and radiology reports (The Gemini Project 117). Diagnostic results are expected to be made available to the doctor within seconds after verification. Another example of an integrated sol ution is Matrixs Tafnit ERP system, a comprehensive solution for laboratory functions. It installs the Autolab LIS that is used to issue referrals and commence data for billing (Assuta Medical Centers n. pag). ... pag). Scenario 2 Detailed Requirements Document i. Stakeholders The most essential initiative in an organization is to provide the needs of its stakeholders--for without them stakeholders, an organization kit and boodle as good as nothing. Incorporating radiology images into the Personal Health Record System would further advance this initiative and is expected to benefit various stakeholders. to a lower place is the list of the prospective stakeholders with their corresponding needs 1. Patients- More than anyone else, they are the ones who would want timely and easy access to services. Remarkably, patients today have low levels of tolerance for slow up or lost reports and films. Patients minimum expectation that needs to be served is to receive quickly generated, read ily available, and reliable radiological reports (Thrall). 2. Referring physicians- As much as possible, physicians would same(p) to have timely access to patient information. For decades, film handling and delivery systems for hard-copy reports have frustrated physicians because of these systems inefficiency and poor reliability (Thrall). 3. Hospitals- Primarily confronted with severe cost-cutting pressures, hospitals seek to run into cost-cutting measures lowering the average lengths of stay, cutting the length of care-process cycle, as well as eliminating some unnecessary inpatient days. Interestingly, hospitals are eyeing on the radiology department to hand the aforementioned objectives (Thrall). 4. Radiologists- Similar to physicians, these key stakeholders are also confronted with unreliable and inefficient hard-copy film management systems. A more improved infrastructure for practice-support and implementation of systems is life-sustaining for their tasks (Thrall). ii.